Communism David Horowitz Frontpagemag US politics

David Horowitz: Are Communists or Neo-Communists Dangerous……?

HELL YES!

Destroying capitalism is always on their minds
In America, the debate on whether or not communism has truly been defeated and no longer constitutes an existential threat, has heated up. Front Page Mag founder, and president of the Horowitz Freedom Center, Davidi Horowitz has this to say about FOX’s Bill O’Reilly, who stated in a discussion with Glenn Beck that: “that he was afraid of Islamo-fascists but not of communists.”
Wake up call for Bill O’Reilly and to all the other conservatives and neoconservative Democrats who should be shocked over the subversion of the Democratic party and the direction that it’s heading. No, communist thinking has not died away Bill, but has successfully morphed itself into something else less recognizeable, but they still exist.

They take their shape in the form of, “community organizers” and “Green Czars”, and in Left-wing trade unions, in universities across the land, and in all of the other myriad off shoot groups that David Horowitz speaks about in the article and in his book. Whether they come from the “social justice” branch of the ne-communist movement or from the radical environmentalist crowd, they share a common characteristic, their immense dislike for capitalist system. Read on.  KGS

Milton Friedman on capitalism

Last Friday night, O’Reilly and Beck had a back-and-forth about communism (inspired by Beck’s takedown of self-proclaimed communist and presidential adviser Van Jones). O’Reilly opined (I hate that word but he likes it, so there it is) that he was afraid of Islamo-fascists but not of communists. Like many Americans, O’Reilly thinks that because the communist party is almost a thing of the past (it exists but is not and will not be big enough to throw its weight around again), the communist idea is dead. It is not.

It’s interesting that we have words like “neo-Nazi” to describe post-Hitler Nazis, and “neo-conservative” to describe liberals who left the Democratic Party when it took a sharp turn to the left, but not “neo-Communist” to describe the massive numbers of people on the left — and among them very influential people — who share, almost to the jot and tittle, the old communist view of capitalism, and are prepared to act on that perception.

Michael Moore’s new film promises to be a dramatization of this view of capitalism if his communist propaganda film Sicko is any indication). Neo-communists like Moore share the old communists’ antipathy for the United States and sympathy for its enemies, even enemies as evil as Iran and Hizbollah. Noam Chomsky, the self-hating MIT sociopath is a big fan of the Hizbollah and Hamas Nazis, so deep is his hatred for Jews and the United States.

Neo-communism is a view whose members consider themselves “citizens of the world,” not of America, and who therefore agitate for open borders and want the morally repulsive collection of autocracies, slaveocracies and kleptocracies called “the United Nations” to reign over us and the world.

A neo-communist is someone who believes that America is ruled by corporations who put “profit over people” — and thereby show that they don’t understand either profit or people. A neo-communist is someone who is convinced that race, class, and gender hierarchies make it not only legitimate but necessary to describe America as a “white supremacist” society. Neo-communists believe that a revolution is necessary (if not opportune at the moment), that the Consitution is a disposable document, and that America’s communist and Islamo-fascist enemies (Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua, Hizbollah, the PLO and Hamas), are freedom fighters or at least on the right side of the armageddon that faces us.

Read it all here.

One Response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *