US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice Lies Through Her Teeth About N.Korea and Bill Clinton…….

John Bolton North Korea Obama Administration Susan Rice US politics

US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice Lies Through Her Teeth About N.Korea and Bill Clinton…….

Oh the lies they tell

Susan Rice:

I believe that N.Korea is not a terrorist state
as much as I believe Bill Clinton was acting as a private citizen

Puhleeeeeze. Who does she think she’s kidding by saying that the US didn’t negotiate with terrorists during the high profile visit of former US president, Bill Clinton, to that nightmare state called North Korea?

Rice ridicules the former US Ambasssador to the UN, John Bolton for his remarks that Clinton’s visit “becomes periously close to negotiating with terrorists.” She couldn’t even hold back a smile when she said that the trip “was of a private citizen and that he was not speaking for the President of the US”. What a bald faced lie.

Watch the vid. KGS

NOTE: Here is what a real political analyst / expert has to say about Clinton’s visit.

John Bolton: “Former president Clinton was met at Pyongyang’s airport by notables led by Kim Kye Gwan, the North’s long-time chief nuclear negotiator, an unmistakable symbol of linkage. In Pyongyang’s view, the two reporters are pawns in the larger game of enhancing the regime’s legitimacy and gaining direct access to important U.S. figures. The reporters’ arrest, show trial and subsequent imprisonment (twelve years hard labor) was hostage taking, essentially an act of state terrorism. So the Clinton trip is a significant propaganda victory for North Korea, whether or not he carried an official message from President Obama. Despite decades of bipartisan U.S. rhetoric about not negotiating with terrorists for the release of hostages, it seems that the Obama administration not only chose to negotiate, but to send a former president to do so.”

Read Atlas’ interview with him as well. KGS

Written by KGS

4 Responses

By Carlos Echevarria Aug 10, 2009

Kissinger had a good article, too, Atlas had it up yesterday…

"Ridiculous statement" by Bolton????

Rice is an Obama goose stepping lackey!!!

We "don't negotiate with terrorists"?????

Let's see Chavez, Castro, Assad, Ahmedinejad, Zelaya, etc.?????
By KGS Aug 10, 2009

Thanks Carlos for the input. This woman couldn't even hold a straight face throughout all the conversation with the interviewer. She knew she was lying…I really long for the Bolton years.
By Kangalanatolian Aug 11, 2009

Could someone remind me again the terrorism committed by North Korea?

Really. Just trying to keep my terms straight.
By KGS Aug 11, 2009

N.Korea had its agents blow up a S.Korean airliner some years ago, they have yet to come clean with it, as well as harboring Red Army Faction terrorists and proliferating nuclear technology to other terrorist supporting states like Syria.

Let's put it this way, there was no one good reason to remove them, other than pure politicking over their nuke programs.

Leave a Reply to Kangalanatolian Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

4 Responses

Leave a Reply to Kangalanatolian Cancel reply