Durban II Text is Getting Worse…….

Anti-Israel bigotry and bias Durban UNHRC

Durban II Text is Getting Worse…….

What’s one to expect from

the OIC corrupted UN?

UNHRC Commissioner Navi Pillay:

I welcome the new 17 page text that reaffirms
the anti-Semitic conclusions of the 2001 Durban Conference.
Being anti-Israel is a UN right, did you expect anything different!

For those who follow the issue of the upcoming Durban II conference in Geneva, you won’t be surprised by the news that the newest version of the draft text for the conference, is as bad, or worse than the original. It’s going to be a trash and bash event, something of which the Tundra Tabloids pointed out to the OIC’s chairman, Ekmeleddin Ishanoglu when he visited Helsinki last year.

TT: “In light of the US Congress resolution, Can OIC sec-Gen offer his own personal assurances that the O I C is not going to use the conference, to attack Israel…?” That Ihsanoglu refused to give his assurances last October, goes to underline the OIC’s agenda for the Durban II conference.

Israel: Durban II text is getting worse

Israel said that the newest version of the draft text for next week’s anti-racism conference released Wednesday in Geneva was worse than the previous one when it came to singling out Israel.

“The new text is not an improvement. If anything it is worse than the previous text because it includes a reference to foreign occupation which in the diplomatic world is code for Israel,” Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva Roni Leshno Yaar told The Jerusalem Post by phone.

In addition, he said, in its opening paragraph the new text continued to reaffirm the conclusions of the 2001 United Nations World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance that met in Durban, South Africa. That text singled out Israel. “We are worse off than we were yesterday,” Leshno Yaar added.

Nothing has changed, the OIC run conference is marching ahead as planned, with its entire focus being on Israel, while states with real human rights abuse problems will be standing in judgement. It doesn’t get any more Orwellian than that, but that is the state of affairs at the UN. KGS

UPDATE: A must read, tells exactly what the TT has been saying all along:

Another Long March Through The UN

“In 1997, OIC members, including Pakistan, Indonesia, Egypt, Algeria, and Bangladesh, among others, similarly took umbrage at investigations of anti-Semitism, and accused the UN special rapporteur on racism of ‘blasphemy’ for reporting on anti-Semitism in Muslim countries. Consequently, in the next report on racism, in 1999, the section on anti-Semitism mentioned specifically only Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union as problem areas. Thus, in apparent deference to many Muslim countries’ claimed privilege, the Human Rights Commission exempted an entire region of the world from scrutiny on anti-Semitism. Under similar pressure from the OIC bloc, in 2002, the Commission terminated the mandate of its special representative on human rights in Iran. “

That’s what OIC Secretary General, Ekmeleddin Ihsanoglu was doing in Helsinki Finland last October, 2008, denying the existence of Muslim anti-Semtism. KGS

Written by KGS

One Response

By There is NO Santa Claus Apr 16, 2009

Wait a minute!

“I welcome the new 17 page text that reaffirms the anti-Semitic conclusions of the 2001 Durban Conference. Being anti-Israel is a UN right, did you expect anything different!”

You have quotation marks around this comment by UNHRC Commissioner Navi Pillay. Did she REALLY say that?

Is Navi Pillay the UNHCR Commissioner today? Or was she the Commissioner in 2001?

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

One Response

Leave a Reply Cancel reply