LGF’s Charles Johnson Just Can’t Resist The Temptation to "JOHNSON"…….

The Counter-Jihad gets “Johnsoned” once again by the LIDLESS EYE!

Staying true to form, the proprietor of the LGF “OBFUSCATES” the truth about the alliance between all the bloggers and political movements within the Counter-Jihad.

CJ: “Here’s one of those people that some “counter-jihad” bloggers still think we should make our allies, one of those tough guys capable of taking on a little dirty work: Hitler-obsessed loner found guilty of planning race war – after child-porn police found stash of nail bombs under his bed in raid.

And in his hate-filled diaries, that symbol again — the symbol that countless apologists for European neo-fascism insist is completely meaningless. Interestingly, Gilleard seems to have viewed the Odin’s Cross as a mutated swastika.”

The Counter-Jihad Charles Johnson is referring to is the collection of bloggers, writers, authors and intellectuals that gathered in Brussels last year, and then again in Vienna this Spring in 2008, to help form a concentrated front against the Islamization of Europe. At no time has there ever been a call for an alliance with Neo-National Socialists whether they be “The Front” or the British BNP”.

Shame on Charles Johnson -or as we say here in Finland: “Hyi Sinua“- for trying to smear a decent movement made up of hundreds of individuals that are nothing of the sort that he claims they are. CJ is still conducting a witch hunt, or as it will be known hence forth and forever more as “JOHNSONING“, against good, decent and most importantly innocent people, who can never offer enough evidence on their behalf to satisfy the self imposed standards of the “LIDLESS EYE“.

No matter what they say, and importantly, what they do, will ever be enough to absolve them from the “smearing tar of Fascism” that Charles at LGF brandishes like a cruel inquisitioner with a clanging hangover. So CJ once again tries to lay down the law as to what a symbol means to everyone who uses them.

Again, I ask both CJ and any of his lizardroids, does the same logic hold for the president of Finland and the Finnish army, due to the symbol displayed on the flag in the picture? You can’t have it both ways, unless you intend to “JOHNSON” both the Finnish president and the Finnish Defence force as well? *L* KGS

NOTE: The Counter-Jihad has never been about race or ethnicity, but about ideology. The fact is, the man in question is a hard core racial supremacist, who hates Jews. His kind would never find a place within the rank and file of the Counter-Jihad, which is openly pro-Israel, philo-Semitic and not anti-Muslim, but against their “Jihad Ideology and Sharia Law”, which are totally unacceptable in our modern day democratic societies.

If Islam was void of those dangerous elements just mentioned, that contribute to the discrimination against women as well as against other forms of minorities, then there would be a need for a counter-jihad. Pure and simple.

UPDATE: The Baron informs the TT about a post recently published at the GOV concerning a Vlaams Belang member, Maria De Berlanger, that was thoroughly trashed by LGF members for being a Nazi. She has been found blameless in charge leveled against her for giving the “Hitler salute” while being sworn into office.

Yes folks, this woman had been “JOHNSONED” by LGF’ers who besmirched her name thoughout the blogosphere. As the Baron pointed out about apologies being sent in her direction by the LGF crowd…….crickets chirping.

Written by KGS

3 Responses

By Vasarahammer Jun 25, 2008

At least he seems to have found a genuine neo-nazi, even though his ties to the evil Counterjihad movement have not yet been proven.

This kind of posts also serve as a way to get rid of evil VB sympathizers and crypto-fascists that occasionally lurk at LGF to keep the cadres of sycophants in order so to speak.
By Henrik R Clausen Jun 25, 2008

Anyone interested in fascism (and that most certainly includes Charles Johnson) would do themselves a great service by reading Liberal Fascism. That book sets enough things straight that the reader will be able to figure out for himself what constitutes fascism and what does not.

Then perhaps we can get a nice apology from CJ and stop these meaningless squabbles.
By Natalie Jun 25, 2008

Henrik, I read that book because of your recommendation and it was very very good. I also would highly recommend it.

Leave a Reply to Vasarahammer Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

3 Responses

Leave a Reply to Vasarahammer Cancel reply