Buffoonery Paleostinians Refugees UN

Removing The Last Vestige of the Cold War: End The UNRWA……!

The best reasons for the UNRWA’s demise, are the ones given in its defense. During Nicholas Burns‘ visit in Bethlehem he stated:

We all, members of the United Nations, have a responsibility to support the Palestinian people who are living under occupation and living in such hardship.”

But wait! There are UNRWA administered camps in Lebanon, Syria and in Jordan (where 70% of the populace claim to be Palestinian). These camps are not in Israeli occupied areas any more than the ones in Gaza and in areas of the WB. The Gloria Center in Herzliya Israel, has recently published an article by Jonathan Spyer who writes about the UNRWA, and the need for it to be dissolved.

When UNRWA first began counting refugees in 1948, it did so in a way without precedent – seeking to maximize the number of those defined as refugees. UNRWA counts every descendant of the original refugees as a refugee themselves – leading to an increase of 400 percent in the number since 1948.

This was a politically motivated definition to imply that either Palestinians would remain refugees forever or until the day that they returned in a triumph to a Palestinian Arab state that included the territory where Israel existed. If they built lives elsewhere, even after many generations – decades or centuries – they still remained officially refugees. In contrast to other situations around the world, other refugees only retained that status until they found permanent homes elsewhere, presumably as citizens of other countries.

Moreover, refugee status was based solely on the applicant’s word. Even UNRWA admitted its figures were inflated in a 1998 Report of the Commissioner General of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (July 1997-30 June 1998): “UNRWA registration figures are based on information voluntarily supplied by refugees primarily for the purpose of obtaining access to Agency services and hence cannot be considered statistically valid demographic data.”

Fostering Conflict
In October 2004, then UNRWA Commissioner General Peter Hansen publicly admitted for the first time that Hamas members were on the UNWRA payroll, adding, “I don’t see that as a crime. Hamas as a political organization does not mean that every member is a militant and we do not do political vetting and exclude people from one persuasion as against another.” Consequently, taxpayers’ money in countries where Hamas was legally defined as a terrorist organization, like the United States and Canada, was being illegally used to fund Hamas-controlled activities.

Hanson’s view that Hamas was a normal political organization whose doctrines did not interfere with the governance and education of Palestinians remains the position of UNRWA. This has been so even when Hamas has committed violence against other Palestinians. After the organization seized Gaza by force in July 2007, UNRWA immediately indicated to Hamas that it was eager to get back to providing its services. Nothing was changed in its procedure or performance after the takeover.

A graphic demonstration of this issue was the death of Awad al-Qiq in May 2008. Qiq had a long career as a science teacher in an UNRWA school and had been promoted to run its Rafah Prep Boys School. He was also the leading bombmaker for Islamic Jihad. He was killed while supervising a factory to make rockets and other weapons for use against Israel, located a short distance from the school. Qiq was thus simultaneously building weapons for attacking Israeli civilians while indoctrinating his students to do the same. Islamic Jihad did not need to pay him a salary for his terrorist activities. The UN and the American taxpayer were already doing so.

Time to end the charade, facade or whatever else you can think to call it, and dismantle the UNRWA. It’s in the best interest of the Palestinians and the Israelis, as well as for those living abroad in other countries, in which many so called refugees already hold citizenship. More here. *L* KGS

2 Responses

  1. KGS,

    Thanks for the article. I would agree that this travesty of a UN function must be disbanded!

    I couldn’t agree more with Jonathan Spyer.

  2. Thanks Hoosierinfidel,

    The UN hasn’t been a good functioning organization since it allowed non-democratic states to join.

    It’s been down hill ever since.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *