Sweden’s Malmö Caves to Islamism…….

Next time heaven forbid, a terrorist attack occurs (or even an act of crime) the perpertor only needs to dress him/herself in a niqab to avoid detection. There is a good valid rason for not allowing people to walk around totally covered in public, face recognition and identification is a standard requirement for law enforcement.

The Local reports on the incident from the viewpoint of the veiled woman “Lenora”, and as Pamela at Atlas Shrugs points out: it is written with a decidedly dhimmi bias. The subjugated cower. More here. *L* KGS

“A Malmö bus driver has been fired from his job following revelations that he stopped a woman from boarding his bus because she was wearing a niqab, a form of Islamic headdress that covers the face.The bus company, Arriva, has elected not to extend the driver’s contract, suggesting that this was not an isolated incident.”

In a somewhat related article by the same paper, a Muslim woman wins a court case against a store that banned her from wearing her head covering. The article fails to describe whether it was a full covering or just a scarf. If the face was not covered, I would say she was well within her rights to wear it. *L* KGS

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Mikko Sandt May 07, 2007

“If the face was not covered, I would say she was well within her rights to wear it”

Don’t you see this as a violation of private property rights? I’d say the owner of the store has every right to make his/her own rules. If these rules don’t please you, you don’t have to work there.
How would you feel if the government told you who you may let in your house?
By KGS May 07, 2007

Personally I believe that there has to be some form of compromise, I am not a legal expert so I will have to defer to the wisdom and knowledge of others on legal matters.

Perhaps you have a point about a business owner choosing what the dressing code for his/her employees should be, but if the wearing of a scarf does not hinder the work involved why make a stink about a scarf?

I am more worried about what is happening in Minnesota, where Muslims are demanding work in a business where they refuse to fullfill all that the job requires due to their religious sensabilities.

Working at a cash counter but refusing to scan pork or alcholol is stupid and the owner should not be forced to hire them.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply