US Speaker of The House, Speaks For Herself…….

The issue of Nancy Pelosi wearing the hijab (Islamic head scarf) inside a mosque is a non issue, her wearing it while she parades through the streets of Damascus….is. Being respective of someones religious beliefs is an expected courtesy, and is practiced by most, if not all visiting dignitaries to a house of worship outside of their own faith.

Pelosi’s placing of religious restrictions upon herself in a public place is ridiculous if not absurd, and curiously akin to Iran’s “dressing up” its hostages in stupid looking polyester suits.

The purpose behind Pelosi’s trip to Syria is meant solely to be a slap in the face of the present US administration –that discouraged her from acting out on her own foreign policy– and will not amount to anything positive. Dictators love photo ops, and the ones taken during her stay in Syria will only prove beneficial to the Syrian regime, not the US or anyone else for that matter.

Farid Ghadry (Reform Party of Syria) writes: “Will Pelosi Take the Blame if Lebanon Falls?

“Reckless is the best way to describe Nancy Pelosi’s latest in-your-face attempt at upstaging George W. Bush foreign policy. Assad is viewing her trip as a green light to take over Lebanon the way Saddam viewed Glapsie’s lack of interference as a green light to invade Kuwait. Will she take the blame if Lebanon falls to Assad and his cabal of murderers and thugs? Probably not. But the American people and the Lebanese must hold her feet to the fire.

Nancy Pelosi is on a power trip. Those who have worked closely with her in Congress speak of a driven, almost maniacal, woman capable of going the distance on issues most Democrats feel are too risqué not only for their Party but also for the American people to accept. Her take-no-prisoners attitude has earned her the coveted Speaker of the House nomination but many believe that her lack of experience will bring about her downfall. “

Only time will tell, just how much damage the Pelosi visit to Syria has caused for the people of Lebanon and for women’s rights in the region. The Democrat Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, is/was in no position to offer any assurances to the Assad regime on behalf of the US government. So one can be excused for not understanding the goals behind the trip –which could never be the basis for anything to build on–…except for Jimmy Carter. Enough said. *L* KGS

Written by KGS

2 Responses

By Dee Apr 05, 2007

KGS: Pelosi is a stink in the nostrils of every red-blooded American and an airhead…Did you see the picture of her crossing herself Catholic style at a Muslim holy place?
Keep up the great blogging. Am checking out some of your other stories.
By KGS Apr 07, 2007

I believe Pelosi was crossing herself before the head of John the Baptist. What is interesting is that the head of John now rests inside a Mosque.Why not an Assyrian Church?

Perhaps because Islam considers John a Muslim, as well as Jesus and Moses. *L* KGS

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

There’s No Common Cultural Legacy For The Alt-Right

Still, is there something to it? Is there a common heritage that will cover El Greco and Hume and Dostoyevsky? Is there one that can include the Jacobites and the Jacobins? There is, but it is not racial, and white supremacists reject it because it rejects them. The unifying heritage of Europe is religious and philosophical. It is Jerusalem and Athens, in one famous formulation. Christian religion and Greek philosophy, filtered through Roman law and culture, are the foundation of European culture. The tensions, agreements, developments and settlements between these have shaped the Western world, and these roots of Western civilization are not congenial to white supremacy.

Christianity is universal in its message and Jewish in its origins. For centuries after its founding, Christianity’s center was the Mediterranean world, including Asia Minor and North Africa. Christianity has never been defined by race, and locally-grown racist heresies are only sustainable among those ignorant of Christianity’s teachings, origins and history.

Greek philosophy is likewise ill-suited to serve as a basis for white identity. It is either too universal (addressing the human condition in general) or too local—none of us live as citizens of an ancient Greek polis. Later philosophical developments in Europe, such as the philosophies of the Enlightenment, likewise tend to be too universal for white supremacists seeking a tribal identity. As for the scientific revolution that developed within Western culture (albeit with much borrowed from outside Europe), math doesn’t care what color someone is.

"More here"

War is being waged against Western culture from within which is in essence a war against Christianity and its moral origins in the Hebrew Bible. By attacking these Biblical foundations in the name of reason and human rights, the culture warriors of secularism are sawing off the branch on which they sit. The only way to defend Western civilisation is to reaffirm and restore its Biblical foundations. My argument is a development of ideas I first explored in my 2012 book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power.

We are living in an era which extols reason, science and human rights. These are said to be essential for progress, a civilised society and the betterment of humanity. Religion is said to be their antithesis, the source instead of superstitious mumbo-jumbo, oppression and backward-thinking.

Some of this hostility is being driven by the perceived threat from Islamic terrorism and the Islamisation of Western culture. However, this animus against religion has far deeper roots and can be traced back to what is considered the birthplace of Western reason, the 18th-century Enlightenment.

Actually, it goes back specifically to the French Enlightenment. In England and Scotland, the Enlightenment developed reason and political liberty within the framework of Biblical belief. In France, by contrast, anti-clericalism morphed into fundamental hostility to Christianity and to religion itself.

“Ecrasez l’infame,” said Voltaire (crush infamy) — the infamy to which he referred being not just the Church but Christianity, which he wanted to replace with the religion of reason, virtue and liberty, “drawn from the bosom of nature”.

Perfecting society

But this Enlightenment did not remove religion so much as pervert it. It took millenarian fantasies, the idea that the perfection of the world was at hand, and it secularised them. Instead of God producing heaven on earth, it would be mankind which would bring that about. Reason would create the perfect society and “progress” was the process by which utopia would be attained.

More here"

“I think that we should correct the vocabulary that we use, and call a spade a spade. It is all about Jihad, the Islamic effort to spread Islam globally”:

Terrorist attack – should be called Military Jihad.

Incitement – Media Jihad.

Al-Jazeera – Media Jihad Channel.

Imposing Sharia law – Judicial Jihad or Legislative Jihad.

Boycotting Israel (BDS) – Economic Jihad.

Emigration to EU and US – Emigration Jihad / Hijra Jihad.

Building mosques, Islamic education institutions – Cultural Jihad.

Halal food – Dietary Jihad.

Hijab or Niqab – Clothing Jihad.

Activity of MSA – Academic Jihad.

Activity of CAIR – Political Jihad / Public Jihad.

Collecting money for Islamic “charities” – Financial Jihad.

Political correctness – Submission to Jihad.

J Street, Peace Now, JVP and their likes – Jewish Useful Idiots who Serve Jihad.

Iran deal – Western Support for Nuclear Jihad.

Share this:

Written by KGS

2 Responses

Leave a Reply Cancel reply